In post-election articles in the Detroit News by Berman and Eggert, accusations were made that the Green Party cost the Democrats the Michigan Senate.  The Green Party has a solution which enhances democracy that was raised during the election campaign and ignored by  the big business media, including all of the Michigan TV stations and the Detroit Free Press and the Detroit News.  The post-election articles in the Detroit News represent the only articles in the Detroit News that covered the Green Party Campaign!

Below are links to the Green Party position on elections:

From the Green Party of Michigan Platform:


"We believe Instant Runoff Voting and Proportional Representation would allow a greater variety of views to be expressed in elections."

From the Lynn Meadows, Green Party Candidate for Secretary of State, website:

Vote for your 1st, 2nd, 3rd ... choices and stop the "Spoiler" threat. In elections with more than two candidates, voters should be able to vote for the person they truly want to do the job and rank their additional choices in order of preference. Instant Runoff Voting (IRV)or Rank Voting assures that the winner has support of the majority of the people, not just "more votes" than any other candidate as in our current "winner take all" system. (www.fairvote.org)

And from the national Green party platform:

8. We demand choices in our political system. This can be accomplished by proportional representation voting systems such as

and semi-proportional voting systems such as

All are used throughout the free world and by U.S. businesses, and community and non-profit groups to increase democratic representation. We call on local governments to lead the way toward more electoral choice and broader representation.

9. We believe in majority rule and reject the present method of election without a majority. Accordingly, we call for the use of Instant Runoff Voting in chief executive races, (mayor, governor, president, etc.) where voters can rank their favorite candidates (1,2,3, etc.) to guarantee that the winner has majority support and that voters are not relegated to choosing between the lesser of two evils.